• archonet@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This guy says that like “bombing Yemen” isn’t a de facto tradition for U.S. presidents. I’m pretty sure every president since Clinton has bombed Yemen at some point during their term. It’s old hat. It’s not news. It was Tuesday.

    Like, sure, it’s terrible and no one will deny that, but we’ve been doing it for 20+ years. This? This clownfuckery? This was new.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Anything to keep israel happy is bipartisan.

      Then you wonder why that the case? If they are right now publicly intervening in US politics, what have they done in the past and what leverage do they have over these public figure?

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Kids were killed but the chat leak was funny and that’s what has been the people talk about instead.

    Imagine being the poor family, who is stuck living in Yemen because they cannot afford to relocate, whose kid has died by Trump’s bombing. Then all you see in the news about how they joked with emojis in chat killing your kid. “Oh your kid was killed in that emoji airstrike.” Tell me why the fuck you would grow up anything but radicalized.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Houthis are the only international actor acting in open military opposition to the genocide in Gaza. They are doing their best to enforce a shipping blockade pending a cessation of Israeli war crimes. The US obviously wants the genocide to continue, as well as all shipping trade through the area.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    people feel there is more of a chance to hold people accountable for the group chat than the bombing

  • Soleos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Because bombing the Houthis for terrorism or attacking Gulf states/western interests has been the status quo for over a decade.

    • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That, and because we don’t care about Yemen, but we do care about an over powered executive abusing power, breaking multiple laws, and endangering US troops/assets.

      TLDR: Bombing Yemin is legal, breaking US national security is illegal.

  • Literocola@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    They’re bombing the Houthi’s in Yemen because the Houthis have been launching Iranian missiles at ships in the Red Sea since 2023? Including the US navy (don’t touch the boats) and Israel. The houthis are currently holding hostage a number of crews of merchant ships

  • Davin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The bombing is worse, but using signal instead of official communication channels is still really fucking serious. They want to plan and commit war crimes and avoid any responsibility for it by trying to keep it from ever getting under public scrutiny.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Also, one is going to spawn more of the other and worse over time.

      It’s not about the chat specifically, it’s about ignoring any sort of rules the government is supposed to be beholden to, and getting away with it consistently as they push more and more.

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    My dude this war in Yemen has been going on for like 10 years. If the idea of bombing Yemen sounds out of left field to you, then you are woefully uninformed.

    • confusedpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I had the opportunity to live in Berlin for a year. I made friends with a group of Yemen students. All of these people had friends, family or relatives bombed to death. Over the course of 2 weeks, one person lost 3 relatives to the bombings…

      These people were sent to Germany to study and be as far away as possible from the horrors at home. Away from friends, family, everyone.

      I was told that after flying to somewhere near Yemen, it would have taken another 16 hours to travel by road to get home. Their parents refused them coming to visit because it was just too dangerous.

      I don’t know how they managed to hold their shit together and carry on even as their families were getting bombed back home.

      It broke my heart and I felt powerless to even attempt to comfort them. I’m sure they felt a sense of powerlessness that’s beyond anything I could understand at that time.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sounds par for the course in the USA.

      People are literally surprised when somebody reads out actual policy which was signed into law and who voted for it.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because they “didn’t vote for that”. They voted for lesser evil, which includes bombing Yemen for a decade. The spoiler effect is obvious to fellow voters, but incomprehensively arcane to lawyers.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          God I fucking wish we voted for the lesser evil.

          For the record, in 2014 Yemen began a civil war and the Obama administration backed the GCC intervention into Yemen, fighting against the Houthi revolutionaries, in 2015 alongside the UN Security Council issuing an Arms Embargo on the Houthis. The US support was logistical and intelligence. This has unfortunately continued to this day, although the previous Biden Administration did publicly announce a withdrawal of that support, but continues sale of armaments to Saudi Arabia who leads the GCC due to condemnation of their strikes on civilians. (The Houthis also strike civilians, mind you).

          TBH I think maybe a more forceful approach, a direct intervention to establish a governance complete with minimal casualties and to provide welfare, to the situation at the end of Obama’s term or the start of the Trump term might have been better than just pussyfooting around and letting Saudi’s commit the warcrimes instead. Either that or doing nothing at all and allowing them to kill each other all on their lonesome so as to keep our own hands clean.

          Another thing I’m not taking into account with this retelling is the whole proxy-war angle wherein Houthis and Saudis gaining support from various outside influences impacts their own allegiances in economic policy and that by not participating it would leave a gap for another world power to establish a different governance in the region that explicitly supports said world power. The whole region is an important economic position for oil and gas as well as shipping between Europe and Asia.

      • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because our entire election cycle isn’t spent on policy, but character attacks.

        To be fair, there’s plenty of material to attack, so I guess they get distracted.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah I blame the citizens over the candidates at this point. Everybody should be educated on what they’re voting for, not whom.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Bush and Obama did it too. Historically, it’s been a targeted killing thing against Al-Qaeda (or so they have said), with whatever government they have, giving their blessing. If other sites are correct, Trump did it more, but it’s kinda hard to pick nits there.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drone_strikes_in_Yemen

    That’s why a lot people are more upset over the lack of operational security than the action itself. They’re not conducting themselves in a way that keeps our country safe, They skirting monitoring and can’t even get that right.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They stopped all raiding when Israel agreed to a cease fire and they only resumed it when Israel resumed their genocide.

      History books will likely see the Houthis as a heroic group that fought against genocide.

    • toolverine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Who are the ships supplying? And why are they firing on them? What’s the stated reason for the blockade?

      The answers to these questions demonstrate why the Signal story is so important.

    • Krono@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Launching a $2 million dollar missile and crushing a few children to death should also be sensational.

      Unfortunately here in America that’s just another Saturday.