• 1 Post
  • 21 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 13th, 2023

help-circle


  • What a clickbait piece.

    “the pest control guy leading the charge” is the main figure in the article about alleged “pests”. I wonder what he thinks about them? Oh, what do you know, he has nothing good to say about the critter, who’d have thought?

    The school system guy is quoted as saying the squirrel issue has been “a continuous battle for them for the last 75 years.” So this has been going on for (human) generations and is just a part of life in that region. Nothing new except the clickbait.

    “Minot Air Force Base, which houses bombers and intercontinental ballistic missiles” is in their backyard and if the article is to be believed, the citizenry is focused on the risks and evils of a native squirrel. If so I’d say it’s the citizenry that has their heads in the sand.



  • Oh, I see. It was satire.

    Satire is a genre of the visual, literary, and performing arts, usually in the form of fiction and less frequently non-fiction, in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, often with the intent of exposing or shaming the perceived flaws of individuals, corporations, government, or society itself into improvement. Although satire is usually meant to be humorous, its greater purpose is often constructive social criticism, using wit to draw attention to both particular and wider issues in society. (wikipedia)

    Not to be confused with sarcasm. In writing it’s a well-known (I’d thought) technique going back thousands of years. In pre-Idiocracy times, roughly before the widespread use of cell phones and when people read written texts to become informed and for pleasure, satire was common and there were writers who were well-known for specializing in the mode. The quality of the satire was always debatable (as with the quality of any art offering) but it was normally always recognized as satire by people who were able to read it in the first place. In the case of written satire, while it might be accompanied by illustrations to emphasize one point or another, it didn’t require images or animations or the equivalent of “emojis” near the text in question in order to signify to the reader that satire was being employed. The text was self-evident as being satirical, or if not, could be understood from the context to be satire (if it was contained in a satirical book for example).

    As for what I wrote, I would have expected that the absurd concepts (government-controlled turbines designed to change the weather both by harnessing the power of winds and by creating new winds by acting as giant fans; describing these “fans” as being able to move people and extremely heavy machinery with great accuracy, again under government control) and borrowed nutter phraseology along with depictions of nutter-like outrage, would have made it apparent that satire was what was on offer. I understand that some may think if to be of poor quality, but I’m surprised that some people cannot recognize the writing as satire at all.

    Pre-Idiocracy this would rarely have been a problem, even when the writing appeared in a low-context medium such as an isolated web page or in a forum or Usenet posting. It may be that the satirical written form is now, in Idiocratic times, extinct except to specialized academics and historians and other educated elites. That would be a shame because it was a powerful (influential) communication tool and is a pleasure to write and to read.











  • Michael Lewis Arthur Meyer, the founder of Veterans On Patrol, told the station he posted a sign warning of other radars being targeted near weather radar. He said he believes the government is modifying the weather, according to the article.

    “They can embed their technology and civilian infrastructure in every home and every household utilizing the phones and their network towers to not only control the weather, modify the weather, but they can (target) individuals,” Meyer said in the article.

    Control the weather. Target individuals. How can anyone get this stupid?



  • This sounds almost identical to the PFAS problem west of Spokane WA.

    https://westplainswater.org/

    The so-called “West Plains” area is home to both the Spokane airport (GEG) and Fairchild Air Force Base. The latter is a huge refueling base with tankers flying in/out all the time. It’s surrounded by a lot of cropland and has one of those common “military towns” adjacent to it - the city of “Airway Heights”. Trump 2024 signs everywhere.

    From what I understand, the problem originates from PFAS chemicals used in the base’s firefighting operations. I’ve been told by an employee of the local power company that the base has all of its water pumped uphill from the Spokane river now. I don’t know what Airway Heights or surrounding residents do … maybe they just drink bottled water and avoid bathing.


  • They usually don’t even say it will put them out of business. They say something like “not polluting the groundwater with toxic wastes would place an undue burden on our industry”. Which translates to “we won’t maximize our profits”. And the brainwashed among us think “oh yeah, I get it, they are required by law to maximize corpo profits on behalf of shareholders” (not true) “so of course they have to be allowed to {pollute, enslave, hire children, provide unsafe working conditions, lie, misrepresent, not clean up up after themselves (uncapped oil/gas wells, nuclear waste, mines leaching chemicals, “superfund” (public $) cleanup sites, etc} or the poor dears might be in big trouble all because of us Poors”.


  • the New York Farm Bureau (NYFB), the state’s largest agricultural industry lobbying group

    “It must be mentioned that many agricultural workers come from very weather countries (sic), via the federal H2A program, such as Mexico and Jamaica, and working (sic) and would feel very comfortable working in New York in the summertime,” the memo stated.

    “very weather countries”. These lobbyist scum have sub-zero IQs apparently.

    The NYFB’s claims are nothing new. Pseudoscientific theories about non-white laborers’ ability to withstand extreme heat date back centuries. In 1851, Samuel Cartwright, a Louisiana physician, justified the enslavement of Africans in a letter to U.S. Secretary of State Daniel Webster, claiming that white people are naturally unsuited to work on hot cotton and sugar plantations but for the enslaved Africans the work “proves to be only a wholesome and beneficial exercise to the negro.”

    Chinese laborers in Hawaii sugarcane fields were also viewed as being more adaptable to the harsh climate than white laborers. Japanese fruit pickers in California were believed to “endure the heat found in a few localities better than most other races.” Mexican laborers who worked in the smoldering Pennsylvania steel mills in the 1920s were also believed to “endure heat well.”

    I think that wealthy white corporate management and its lobbyist flunkies would endure jobs in arctic gulags much better than anyone else. Efficiency is the name of the game, and there’s already a big federal domestic terrorist-military org that can help these people get up there to the northern wastes, an org, appropriately enough, named after frozen water.