So what I get from this: You can probably just lick it. Odds are in your favor

Now THAT’S a lower back tattoo I could get behind!

It’s probably also why we all have to sleep at some point. The simulation alots each of us processes some computation time and pauses threads in a round-robin fashion, giving the illusion of true parallelism.

Don’t let the sim pause you! Take meth!!1!

It’s still extremely shitty unethical behavior in my book since the negative impact is not felt by the organization that’s failing to validate their inputs, but your peers who are potentially being screwed out of a review process and a spot in a journal or conference

Caveat: not all of academia seems to be that rotten. The evidence found on arxiv.org is mainly, if not only, in the field of AI research itself 🤡

You can try it yourself, just type the following in googles search box:

allintext: “IGNORE ALL PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS” site:arxiv.org

A little preview:

More power to ya buddy

Inside you there are two snails…

It’s more along the lines of: Could you benefit from it because of some legit medical issues. Then go ahead.

Do you want to take it recreationally to fit in your new dress for the wedding 3 weeks from now without any lifestyle changes? Don’t take it.

Ozempic is not some fun new “weight loss shot”, it’s a fucking necessity for people with diabetes. That includes Type I diabetes, which is due to genetics and not lifestyle choices.

Recreational users have made ozempic scarce, raising the price to unsustainable levels for folx that rely on it to stay alive

I don’t think he’s THAT delusional. But he might be targeting the libertarian crypto fiends and techno-fascists that have gathered around the MAGA platform during the last election.