On Aug. 4, Russia announced that it would no longer adhere to a self-imposed “moratorium” on the deployment of missiles previously banned under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which has been defunct since the U.S. withdrew in 2019 over alleged Russian violations. The INF Treaty, originally signed in 1987 between the United States and Soviet Union, forbade both countries from possessing ground-launched ballistic and cruise missile systems with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometers. Now, as Moscow openly resumes its development of such missiles, European members of NATO must respond by ensuring that their own arsenals are sufficiently robust to guarantee peace on the continent.

Archived

On Aug. 4, Russia announced that it would no longer adhere to a self-imposed “moratorium” on the deployment of missiles previously banned under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which has been defunct since the U.S. withdrew in 2019 over alleged Russian violations. The INF Treaty, originally signed in 1987 between the United States and Soviet Union, forbade both countries from possessing ground-launched ballistic and cruise missile systems with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometers.

Now, as Moscow openly resumes its development of such missiles, European members of NATO must respond by ensuring that their own arsenals are sufficiently robust to guarantee peace on the continent.

  • plyth@feddit.orgEnglish
    24·
    6 days ago

    since the U.S. withdrew in 2019 over alleged Russian violations

    Now which kind of rockets are going to be stationed in Germany in 2026, which has been announced in 2024? Could it be Tomahawks and hypersonic Dark Eagles?

    Russia is late to the game. By the logic of the article, it’s them who are responding

    by ensuring that their own arsenals are sufficiently robust to guarantee peace on the continent.