• Kanda@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess Germany after the 30’s (and maybe even after 1919), France after the whole Revolution and Napoleon thing, the UK after voting to KEKW their economy, Norway after being ruled by Sweden… The list probably goes on

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which french revolution? ;) There’s lots of people who saw and still see the whole french revolution thing as a net positive. The UK has never had a good proper revolution and it shows.

      Napoleon did a lot of things, but those bad things were in line with the absolutist rulers from before the revolution, he just happened to be more successful at it. But he also did many good things during his rule. Fe, the Napoleonic code was hugely influential worldwide and a major change for the good. 2 centuries later it doesn’t hold up as well in the countries that still use the same justice system, but for it’s time, it was really good. Overall, I’d say Napoleon still has a stellar reputation, unlike India.

      How was Norway worse after they last gained independence from Sweden?

      • lemmingrad@thelemmy.clubBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The UK had to murder his king to get a parliament though :D and tbh the french revolution was a great moment, but also a hugely violent one, and the people did not prevail. The liberals did.

  • lemmingrad@thelemmy.clubBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So we switched from exotic fetichizing orientalism toward casual racism? Sounds like two pieces of the same coin.