• CXORA@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    There probably was a historical jesus.

    Otherwise I don’t see why Christians would have made up the whole trip to Bethlehem story about a census which we have no record of. They needed the real jesus to have some reason to be in the prophecied place.

    • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      At that time in that region there were a lot of cults. It’s very likely that the Jesus figure from the bible is an amalgamation of multiple cult leaders from that period.

      • CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Of course, by the definition of cult used at that time all monotheistic and henotheistic religions are cults.

        • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Yes they are. The only difference between a cult and a religion is the number of followers.

          • CXORA@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Well no, in the first century a cult is a group which worships a single god. Like the various mystery cults that thrived in ancient Rome.