• Senal@programming.devEnglish
      914·
      2 days ago

      And i was correcting the misconception that just because someone is neurodivergent doesn’t make them immune to being an arsehole.

      Neurodivergent people are people, with all that entails.

        • Senal@programming.devEnglish
          42·
          2 days ago

          Nobody said autism is bad (in the chain im replying to), but here we are.

          Two statements that never happened with two corrections that aren’t needed apparently.

          • buttnugget@lemmy.world
            21·
            2 days ago

            They did say autism was bad. That’s the whole point of the correction. Are you just dead set on being an asshole?

            • Senal@programming.devEnglish
              21·
              2 days ago

              The entire post was :

              I’m just glad they got a power hungry, austistic lunatic in charge now, so everyone can see this is absolutely the end game, before this becomes normalized and people like me get called retarded for not wanting a car that can be remote deactivated.

              Point at where the person said autism was bad and i’ll drop it.

              • buttnugget@lemmy.world
                1·
                2 days ago

                If you cannot parse “power hungry autistic lunatic” as having negative connotations then I’m not sure what I could ever attempt to discuss with you.

                • Senal@programming.devEnglish
                  1·
                  2 days ago

                  If you want to pretend your interpretation of three descriptors is universal then i’m not sure discussion is what you are looking for.

                  Two potentially (probably) negative and one neutral, to me, but what do i know , you are the arbiter of correct interpretations after all.