

They’re just gonna run the same play? They might be racist/tribalistic enough for the grift to work, hopefully they’re not. 🤷
Trying my hardest to be civil in this uncivilised world.
They’re just gonna run the same play? They might be racist/tribalistic enough for the grift to work, hopefully they’re not. 🤷
Intelligence, as the word has always been used, requires awareness and understanding, not just spitting out data after input, as dynamic and complex the process might be, through a set of rules. AI, as you just described it, does nothing necessarily different from other computational tools: they speed up processes that can be calculated/algorithmically structured. I don’t see how that particularly makes “AI” deserving of the adjective ‘intelligent’, it seems more of a marketing term the same way ‘smartphones’ were. The disagreement we’re having here is semantic…
Do you think “AI” KNOWS/UNDERSTANDS what a grammatically incorrect sentence is or what molecules even are? How?
If someone is, let’s say, “limited enough” for it to be a proper replacement for deep human interaction, then maybe it’s not so bad, idk. I haven’t met anyone like that yet, though, idk if they exist.
My wife is about 1 cm taller than me but she’s just physically tiny, like “I can grab her by the torso with one hand” small. I’m always surprised at how delicate she seems and how one of my bones is two of hers… and these people have a whole Alien violently coming out of them sometimes! 😅❤️
I can’t wait to see what A2 can do!
I think you sound pretty cool and slightly unhinged, lol. Is this some sort of “aggressive penis envy?” 😅 Regardless, it sounds like you’re having a good time and no one is actually hurt so 🤷.
My jinji, don’t you cry… 🎶
I’m not gonna claim to ‘know’ things here, and I’m too groggy to even attempt to give you a satisfying answer but: applied formal logic as seen in any machine based on logic gates is just an expression/replication of simplified thought and not a copy of our base mental processes. The mind understands truths that cannot even be formalized or derived, such as axiomatic truths. Even if something can be understood and predicted, it doesn’t mean the process could be written down in code. It certainly isn’t today…
My understanding of the topic is closer to Roger Penrose’s postulates so please check this wiki page and maybe watch a couple of vids on the topic, I’m just a peasant with a hunch when it comes to “AI”. 🤷
Not just human but many other animals too, the only group of entities we have ever used the term ‘intelligence’ for. It could be an entirely physical process, sure (doesn’t imply replication but at least holds a hopeful possibility). I’m not gonna lie and say I understand the ins and outs of these bots, I’m definitely more ignorant on the subject than not, but I don’t see how the word intelligence applies in earnest here. Handheld calculators are programmed to “solve problems” based on given rules too… dynamic code and other advances don’t change the fact that they’re the same logic-gate machine at their core. Having said that, I’m sure they have their uses (idk if they’re worth harming the planet for them with the amount of energy they consume!), I’m just not the biggest fan of the semantics.
‘Intelligence’ requires understanding, understanding requires awareness. This is not seen in anything called “AI”, not today at least, but maybe not ever. Again, why not use a different word, one that actually applies to these advanced calculators? Expecting the best out of humanity, it may be because of the appeal of the added pizzazz and the excitement that comes with it or simple semantic confusion… but seeing the people behind it all, it probably is so the dummies get overly excited and buy stuff/make these bots integral parts of their lives. 🤷
I’m sorry, OP. 😔 Out of curiosity, are you in a committed relationship?
I still think intelligence is a marketing term or simply a misnomer. It’s basically an advanced calculator. Intelligence questions, creates rules from nothing, transforms raw data from reality into ideas, has its own volition… And the same goes for a chess engine, of course, it’s just more visible because it’s not spitting out text but chess moves. Intelligence and consciousness don’t seem to be computational processes.
I don’t share your opinion (for both sexes, ofc) but I like the fact you take a stance on what you think is right. 👍
I don’t see it. Lingerie, bikinis, outfits with little to no fabric, they’re all in the same category of “revealing outfits”. That’s all OP said, and that’s just a visible fact. Everything else happened in your head. My post replying to OP is actually somewhat critical, although more of the industry and Ameircan ideology.
What about moral shaming? OP didn’t do any of it, though. I’m more than open for it… but sometimes people mistake discussions for e-stoning. 🤷
The fact that many of them got couch-casted (industry heads are old dirty men like Harvey Weinstein Clive Davis, y’all know how it goes) plus being hedonistic and single/in PR relationships/in lavender marriages probably both prepares them and allows them to be overly sexual. Sex sells, and the only deity America truly worships is money…
shares opinion online
ARE YOU POLICING?!?
What are you even doing in discussion spaces if you can’t stand it?
Got banned for opposing genocide and Western imperialism in a main subreddit. 🤷
Triple digits?! Yare-yare… I guess the main deciding factor would be: are you still a competitive hedonist or have you finally understood the almost sacred and unbreakable relationship between love and sex?