Primer

That is exactly what they mean.

Sanctions work less effectively the more they are used, and Biden already unleashed extreme sanctions against them in the starting days of the war.

It seriously fucked with their economy, which is why they then took steps to sanction-proof themselves.

Freedom from threats of US sanctions is a big part of the impetus of BRICS.

A big part of why they earn MORE from their gas now then before the war is India, a supposed ally and one that should be enforcing the sanctions but won’t because they’re not willing to commit economic suicide for the US.

Never assume your enemy is stupid or doesn’t get a say in how they respond to your attacks.

This comment is just ‘what do you have to worry about it you’re not doing anything wrong’ with extra words.

Hauk

For one, it wrecks your battery life.

Secondly, everyone I know my age keeps GPS off unless using a mapping program.

Finally regarding app privacy, people do care about that which is why grapheneos and other privacy focused OS’s exist.

The fact that you don’t care about privacy and want the government and corporations to have every sext you’ve ever received or sent doesn’t mean that others don’t care as well.

So, to be clear, you do condemn Nat Turners slave uprising?

You condemn ANC’s necklacing people? You condemn the terrorism that created Israel? You condemn any violence that results in peoples liberation?

Do you condemn Nat Turner?

Do you condemn the Warsaw Uprising?

I notice you don’t answer those questions because it might make you think uncomfortable thoughts.

Come on, if you’re so moral have the courage of your convictions. Either explain how those were different or condemn them. If not, you’re just a jackass with no moral code other than “this feels icky”

I called you pro-genocide because you are trying to imply that the palestinians are morally the same as the IDF. Get it right if you’re going to try and reference what I said.

You’re literally justifying genocide. Bye.

So you condemn Nat Turner?

EDIT: accidentally responded to the wrong person

Are you saying that you think violent resistance against people killing and kidnapping your children is wrong?

How would you resist people killing and kidnapping your children?

Do you condemn John Brown? Do you condemn the ANC’s violent resistance against the apartheid government of South Africa? Do you condemn the black people of Rhodesia fighting their occupiers?

Or, maybe a better example of your moral cowardice, you would have condemned the Warsaw Uprising.

EDIT: Do you you also demand people condemn Nat Turner?

Only one country is committing genocide.

Furthermore, resistance against occupiers is not only legal but enshrined in international law.

Apartheid countries, like Israel, are inherently occupiers.

I had a tiny 5 lb Burmese cat that would hop up in my lap, fart, and jump down.

He also liked to curl up underneath the covers when I slept in the tent made by my knees being up in bed. One day I farted on him. In response, he bit my dick. Not hard, but like the ‘I’m biting you not to hurt you but to indicate my displeasure with you’ type bites.

Yeah, they understand farts. His whole farting on me and leaving thing was intentional.

I miss you so much, little dude.

Only person here making pro-genocide arguments here is you.

Fucking both-siding genocidal fuck.

You’re not clever and it is clear what you are doing.

Edit: to be absolutely clear: you are pro-genocide and you’re trying to justify it by sounding anti-genocide. But you, personally, are bad at rheoteric, and it would be clear to a child what you are doing.

Israel should be their own nation. No money for anything to a country committing genocide.

… Yes…?

That would, in fact, be the purpose of a honeypot blackmail intelligence operation.

Mossad would not care to blackmail some random person. But having photos/video of a world leader assaulting a child? That would be very valuable to Mossad.

I’m not saying Mossad members are on that list.

I’m saying there is a lot of evidence that Mossad set the entire thing up to generate that list.

This should not be downvoted.

All available evidence is pointing to Epstein being an intelligence operation run by Mossad.

Canada is three mining companies in a trench coat.

It’s both not as liberal and not as nice as it has a reputation for being.

If Cascadia has a chance, it isn’t with Canada.

Irans retaliatory strikes defending against Israel’s unjustified cowardly sneak attack to start a fight the Israelis were to weak to win.

There, I fixed the title for you.

He absolutely redefined to justify killing children. Bush didn’t do that. It was used, under Bush, to justify torture and jailing of adults.

Obama re-invented it for his purposes. The purpose being to kill children without consequence.

In my mind, that definitional change is significant enough that he owns a lot of that blame.

Fucking goddammit, he redefined the word to justify killing children. Why do you defend that?

EDIT: Removed indirect articles for easier readability, content is the same.

It was under Bush to justify imprisoning civilians. Bush was all for direct war actions.

Obama massively increased bombings and drone bombings to pull out combat troops and would do stuff like double tap weddings. To lower the number of civilian deaths, Obama declared any male over the age of 14 to be, by definition, an enemy combatant.

The person you responded to was correct, though a bit imprecise with their words.