

Fair enough, I mostly have experience with i2p which was a pretty bad experience.
Fair enough, I mostly have experience with i2p which was a pretty bad experience.
deleted by creator
But neither has the speed or selection that regular torrenting with VPN has at the moment.
That’s a pretty decent rent for a room, probably also including meals?
I’m guessing you’re trying to be facetious, but yes that is absolutely what I see.
IDK, it’s probably highly culturally dependent. To me the mustache is stereotypical creepy redneck.
There’s just so few things that people actually watch multiple times. The things that people actually watch multiple times tend to be the same handful of movies and shows that rotates over the years. To do that you only need a very small library. Having a large media library is mostly just waste of space, even if it’s digital is wasted because you’re unlikely to watch 90% of it after the first time.
But, for me at least, not only having media when I’m at home is the real benefit. Not everyone wants to manage their own media server with remote access and the eventual debugging that follows with it.
They’re not really the stereotypical embodiment of clean shaven though…
I just don’t get how the redneck rapist look came to be desirable…
The stink (perfume or BO) and unwanted proximity to strangers makes it a very unpleasant experience, no book or movie can make up for that IMO.
Environmentally, absolutely…personally? I absolutely fucking hate using public transport. I’d take 90min of sitting still in traffic alone in my car over bumping and griding with random strangers for 90min on a train any day.
This point i don’t get…in all my jobs, team leads, department managers and basically all management level employees are sitting in the same open office as everyone else. I have never been somewhere where this is not the case. Is this a predominantly American thing?
Yes you have to initiate the installation manually, and if it doesn’t have wifi access (not cellular) it doesn’t download the updates either.
You’ve excellently demonstrated how different contexts makes different things work…you scenario has no similarities to the image
How is just tagging him by name, and repeating his first name succinct? I don’t get any sort of meaning from that response, it reads like a mistyped response.
Like I already wrote in a different reply, that part I get, it’s the Merriam Webster response that doesn’t make sense to me.
Huh…what they actually write in the response in no way suggests that to me, it’s just completely nonsensical like they started typing the response but accidentally hit send too soon and just didn’t bother fixing it.
Yes that part I get, but I don’t get the reply from the Merriam Webster account and why that is funny
I’m too dumb to get this one…why is this funny?
e,t,u and s