Yeah! Same! I say that all the time. Although the cringe policing wasn’t as hard core before days of constant public documentation of all of the things. You kinda just drifted away from people who were cringe, and they had to figure it out without anything being spelled out for them. At least kids nowadays have a very complex and comprehensive guide to follow. Kinda. I’m still glad I’m pre, all of that.
It’s so much the emperor’s new clothes, though. It’s not real, it doesn’t work how they think or say, it’s gunna bust, big time. They’ve built thier castles on sand.
Omfg! Same!
I think the celebrities speaking out in these and other ways, won’t mind being eaten. They’ll just conceded to settle in to a fairer system, whereas those who don’t comply with our demands, nom fkn nom.
How boring would you be if you didn’t have some cringe stories! They prove you really lived life to the full. You can’t get 100% correct in a fallible meat suit and the fickle, gatekeepy, hot or not, societal mind.
If he’s responsible for the thanks, he’s responsible for the criticism, too. If he wants thanks for them being fed, he deserves a serve for every baby that’s died. Scum.
Yeah he did that on purpose.
It’s not make up that causes long lines. Please tell me you’re being sarcastic and I’ve missed it.
That’s not the only blockage to noticing sarcasm, there are so many people who say these / the things and actually MEAN them. We need differentiators, because the crazy levels are too high to wade through.
Nah. It’s still sending money to Israel, just a tiny bit less. It’s still sending money for weapons to continue the genocide. Just because it’s a little less makes zero effect on the morality, it’s still furthering the genocide. It’s just phrased to make you think it’s doing something to cause less harm. It’s not.
I think the real question is, HOW DO THEY KNOW WHAT HE WAS THINKING! HOW!
Yeah, broken clocks and monkeys with type writers, hey!
People of science understand, without the parables, because they have the working and “book” knowledge to interpret the relative meaning of the presented data. To communicate the meaning relative data, without the background knowledge, and without taking the time to learn (or even package for small, focused learning) it is easier to understand, if put into a relative comparable, with similar, relative distance, or changes. Especially when people are already overloaded with *gestures towards everything. The way to eat an elephant, small bites. It’s an elephant to people without all that back knowledge or ability to interpret the science, so you gotta break it into small bites for them, using your understanding.