

I read most this article and don’t see how any of it is false or misinformation. Literally the first word in the page is “alleged”, and it’s full of arguments with linked citations from both sides
안녕하세요!
I read most this article and don’t see how any of it is false or misinformation. Literally the first word in the page is “alleged”, and it’s full of arguments with linked citations from both sides
Wait, how is you providing evidence to back up your argument “doing work for others”?
JK we all know the answer … 🤡
Link or gtfo, let people check the sources themselves
Why wouldn’t they default to not accepting any AI generated content
If you can accurately detect what content is AI generated, you’ll have a company worth billions overnight
No, in this case autopilot never disengaged (but according to the article, it should have issued the warning and disengaged earlier)
Rare Australia W
There’s a lot of really bad slop on YouTube. Your algorithm might be curated to “documentaries”, but that’s far from the norm
Why are you paying these oligarchs at all? Pirate your music
Putting a title on it (I.e. “Big beautiful bill”) doesn’t mean it is a big, beautiful bill.
I’m not skeptical of DEI because I’m against “diversity, equity, and inclusion”, I’m skeptical because of piss poor implementations of it I see in the workforce
These responses closely mirrored examples of the false claim from pro-China sources, which alleged that Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was suppressing opposition voters by deliberately withholding voter notifications.
There’s two things at play here. First, all models being released these days have safety built into the training. In the West, we might focus on preventing people from harming others or hacking, and in China, they’re preventing people from getting politically supportive of China. But in a way, we are all “exporting” our propaganda.
Second, as called out in the article, these responses are clearly based on the training data. That is where the misinformation starts, and you can’t “fix” the problem without first fixing that data.
What is the proof it’s a lab leak?
If we’re gonna put on tinfoil hats, I’m gonna call out the poop samples in Europe that had COVID detected in them one month prior to the outbreak in Wuhan
1/ fake and gay
2/ if you can’t afford a lawyer, then you REALLY need a lawyer
That’s not how evidence works but I appreciate the thought
The user experience of Monero is poor.
While it is true that getting your first credit card isn’t exactly a 10 second ordeal, people at least have their credit card. How are people going to acquire their first Monero?
Hopefully this helps create precedent to stop enforcing copyright for everyone
I know it’s popular to hate on LLMs here at Lemmy, but what is “Artificial Intelligence” if not “Counterfeiting Thought”? Those words map to each other pretty nicely
Distro? No. Wayland? Yes…