Trigger Warning! #Trump #Epstein
To be clear this YouTube link is the testimony of a victim - Not Ghislaine.
It is really hard to watch
She graphically describes what happened:
Most girls were 13-14
Trump kept requesting her. He demanded she wear a blonde wig; he said she looked like his daughter who was also 13 at the time
Trump forcibly took her virginity
I used to be a weekly Hertz customer and I noped right on out after this started happening.
Ask Trump. He and The Enquirer had a long relationship of “catch and kill” for stories detrimental to Trump.
It smells a lot like extortion.
It is The Economist. Are you holding out for a more reputable publication?
I included a link
If that were true, then there would be no controversy whatsoever.
However, this is the rare case where facts don’t have a liberal bias.
Transgender women are setting a disproportionate number of new world records in women’s athletics.
Sports should have two categories: “open” and “female”
https://economist.com/leaders/2022/03/19/sports-should-have-two-categories-open-and-female from The Economist
This is a great wedge issue for conservatives to split liberals.
Reading these comments you would think he hates trans people. Instead, he said:
“I think it’s an issue of fairness. I completely agree with you on that. It is an issue of fairness, it’s deeply unfair… I revere sports. So, the issue of fairness is completely legit," he said.
On the topic girls playing sports against genetic males.
Adjudicated.
But it counts the same.
This is a good thing.
Don’t start with the woe is me stuff when we are finally causing real damage to the cult.
Let’s see how much ground we can continue to gain.
Upvote Epstein and warn people off the distractions
He is trying to distract from Epstein
Don’t fall for it
The cancer example is plausible, but I am not sure you would always win.
In that case you are asking for help for a specific reason. They “get to feel good about helping solve your problem”.
Your deception deprives them of their having done something good with their money - which is the tort.
In OP’s instance, he was saying that he had a birthday and you are giving him a gift.
Not the same - you can make the same argument, but it is even thinner gruel.
There is no mention of any consideration (a legal term meaning he didn’t promise them anything in return) provided by the “boyfriend”.
This would not be fraud under English common law.
This seemed a little clickbait-y
Remember when there was a natural disaster on the East Coast and when there were fires in California and Texans said it was God’s judgment?
I do.
She will get reelected by the citizens of northeast Georgia because they vote.
Do you?
(More of a comment to the average reader, not an attack on OP)
If your proscriptions were adopted, at least 4 billion people would starve and/or die from disease.
Kennedy doesn’t care.
This is what happens when you vilify the safest weed killer ever discovered because “chemicals are bad”.
Not to mention that the kind of anti-scientific hysteria around glyphosate led directly to Robert Kennedy Junior.
That is a deep cut reference. They are relaunching as an AI play.
That will bring back the people who were providing the free content.
(/s on the last part)
Hati didn’t have it either.
It didn’t stop France from demanding it.
It’s like the rest of it. It starts out as a pwn the libs until it’s not.