Most of the far lefters I’ve seen around here are in the “both sides!” camp.
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
Rhoeri@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Luigi Mangione makes first public statement since arrestEnglish01·6 months agoSoooo… if so many people here seem to think Luigi didn’t do it, then why is everyone rushing to his defense? Why all the memes? Why the aggressive defense of an “innocent man?”
If he didn’t do it, then aren’t you all just hero-worshiping some random dude, while the “real” shooter is still at large?
Let’s assume Luigi is innocent as a result of “jUsT LoOk aT tEh viDeO!”, then that means the focus would shift on finding who the actual shooter is. And considering how everyone around here seems to be pro-murder depending on who the victim happens to be, that would mean your hero-at-large would be at risk of getting discovered and arrested.
If Luigi is innocent, and you all want the identity of the “real” shooter to remain safely unknown, as one would think you should… maybe you’d be best served by having Luigi taking one for the team?
Just a thought.
So… protests votes DO work. I must have been confused earlier. I think I understand now.
Protests vote when you’re not getting the perfect outcome, and everyone else can kindly insert themselves under the that bus headed this way.
Super fantastic! Thanks for clearing this up. Again, I knew it was one or the other.
So… protest votes don’t work. Got it. Thanks. I knew it was one or the other.
So, protest voting worked in this case?
So you’re saying that protests votes don’t work?
The Protest Vote Paradox™
As we’ve all read time after time in the months leading up to the election, the Protest Vote™ simply states states that:
“We refuse to vote against a Tyrant-Felon in order to send a clear and concise message that we will not stand for [roll D20 for random popular single issue], and alongside our refusal to vote against the Tyrant-Felon, is a collective hope that the aforementioned clear and concise message- if ignored, is received under unmitigated duress!”
-Cut to Tyrant-Felon’s win, and the aftermath:
Wether observed or not, the behavior of the Protest Voter will attempt to achieve the following:
• Obnoxiously tell everyone “We told you all what would happen!”
• Claim there is “No way protest voting could cause trump to win.”As both of these options cannot simultaneously be true in the same reality without breaking important time-space things that we would probably prefer not be broken- we are left with only a few logical conclusions:
- Protest voters have no idea what they’re talking about.
- Protest voters don’t understand the concept of hypocrisy.
- Protest voters have somehow learned to defy reality and become exempt from the concept of paradoxes, thus creating an entirely new study of theoretical science, known as Bulletproof Symbiotic Hypocrisy Theory, or BLsHt.
Something, something, something Ted Talk.
You know, I’ve seen FAR more leftists and third party vote wasters saying this than I ever see democrats saying it.
And you don’t think marxists have a Marxist bias?
I sure am glad we dodged that bullet by not electing Kamala! Could you imagine the hell we’d be living gin right now?