

…
Looking back at the code (Sigh), it’s to prevent setting the CARGO
variable to cargo mommy, and causing an infinite loop.
You can still do cargo mommy mommy
if you like double praises
…
Looking back at the code (Sigh), it’s to prevent setting the CARGO
variable to cargo mommy, and causing an infinite loop.
You can still do cargo mommy mommy
if you like double praises
That’s if the ai is learning from the responses. But there it’s more of a problem with the site not filtering data
That’s prepared statements, not AI generated.
… Although… It could be made, and sending the error could lead to a more personalized response. As well as being able to use character definitions from ai chat bots.
… Is it more cursed yet?
They didn’t even have mentioned the comments in the source code
/// Mommy intentionally lets her little ones call her recursively, since they might want to hear more from her~
///
/// If they call her a thousand times in a row, though, something has probably gone wrong 😏
const RECURSION_LIMIT: u8 = 100;
/// This name is intentionally not user-configurable. Mommy can't let the little ones make *too*
/// much of a mess~
const RECURSION_LIMIT_VAR: &str = "CARGO_MOMMY_RECURSION_LIMIT";
TBF, it’s more that Spotify allows 3rd party to add to artist pages without artist consent than any ai stuff. It was happening before ai
No need. It’s the best DB… Until you need something portable
?
But then the joke wouldn’t be against AI?would just be some absurdist comic
PS: The pic was self hosted on open source generation software. No corporate generator was used
That’s the rust version