The distinction between AI and GenAI is like the difference between eating and cannibalism; one contains the other, but there’s still a meaningful distinction.

Generative AI produces text or images by leveraging huge neural networks weighted by tons and tons of training data. It’s fundamentally a system of guesses and vibes.

Machine learning in general is often much more precise. The model finding early cancer in scans isn’t just guessing the next word, it’s running the image through a series of precisely tuned layers.

The industry term for the distinction is supervised vs unsupervised learning.

Who has ever seen a yellow Canada tour bus? Pretty much the only yellow busses in US and Canada are for school.

But the queen can move diagonally between the formation.

deleted by creator

They never should have ripped the solar panels off the Whitehouse.

Fuck you too pal

Couldn’t they just start accepting ACH to get around the payment processors? Or is that overly complicated?

I have always thought marshmallow maties made more sense than lucky charms. It’s only natural for marshmallows adrift in a milk sea to turn to piracy.

There are some that are a heck of a lot better. Oxfam, Ben & Jerries, maybe Valve; but it does seem that on a large enough timeline all of them turn to the dark side.

I think we just don’t like guns.

Also his wrists are phasing through each other.

Biden

What’s alarming about that? One of the most common troll behaviors is jaqing off, pretending not to have an agenda when you do.

Regardless, the comment isn’t even in the negatives, so for as many down voted more upvoted.

Yeah, they should have. Congress ended up doing the opposite, forcing him to continue funding. Democrats don’t have nearly the party unity that Republicans do around immigration, I think that’s why it keeps being leveraged as a wedge issue.

I thought you were saying they were ineffective at enacting their agenda because they didn’t use rescission packages.

If we’re talking about what you just said I have no quarrel.

I’m with you there but you could not have got even a simple majority of elected representatives to agree to that. It would have to be something that Democrats broadly support.

Well a rescission package can only be used to cut spending, so it couldn’t have been used by the Democrats to pass new spending.

What do you think they should have used it to cut?

The only differences I can think of is not chickening out on the tariffs and forcing the interest rate lower to kick off runaway inflation.

https://the-boys.fandom.com/wiki/Ashley_Barrett

She’s a character in The Boys

Sounds like Ashley Barrett