Authorized-hardware only when 🤔
Then we’re back to Telesyncs - will be cloud services with device + camera farms to help us rip videos that must be viewed on specific devices - those that pass checks ensuring the only output is on the screen itself
Then they’ll work on anti-recordable screens? :)
heh I’d like to trust that plan for sure
yt-dlp already tougher to use today than in years past—and assuming everything will survive new content deals, uploader purges, etc. is optimistic
How to protect against bitrot?
Feels like the wrong community here for this screenshot
Confirming egg
So good! Just scrolled through a number of them. Thanks :)
💯
Love the snark in this thread
When ppl really Get It, you love to see it
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Interesting. Curious for a point of comparison how The Onion reads to you.
(Only a mediocre point of comparison I fear, but)
Very interesting - two people run a red light, exact same crime unless one gets lucky and there’s no stroller in the crosswalk at the time
Ahaha that’s wild, listened right after commenting - the only thing that you can’t replace!
It was totally Dane Cook, prob this! Not sure if I revisit the clip, is he still funny to me? Maybe I should keep the memories :)
Meanwhile Mulaney was hilarious; he still is but he used to be too
Wait is it the bit I’m thinking of?
Someone stole the fresh batteries in our remote!!
A young Russian nobleman intends to give his estate to peasants upon inheriting them. He also realizes that over time, his ideals might fade. Thus, he puts his ideas down into a legal document that can only be revoked by his wife. He makes her promise not to consent if he changes his mind later on.
At the time, he argues these core beliefs are an essential part of him, stating: “If I lose these ideals, I want you to think that I cease to exist.”
Now suppose 50 years later, he changes his mind and asks his wife to revoke the documents. The wife made a promise to the young nobleman. Is the old nobleman, with all his memories and new beliefs, the same person as the young nobleman? What should she do?
Thanks for the feedback. Felt a good fit: censored comment, reply about censorship, reply to continue discussion about censorship with a quick tag to make the censored party aware while letting the replier know their comment was helpful too.
Other replies about censorship could continue below mine, whereas non-meta replies would create their own thread segments.
Could’ve replied directly and said “as @commenter_who_mentioned_censorship said …”, too. Did want both users to be notified (we’re a small bunch out here). Further thoughts from ya welcome
Thanks, this should almost be annotated on the image before reposting here - so important