Sometimes I’ll post a picture straight from a duckduckgo search, and it doesn’t work without the stuff after the ?

(I’m also not sure how long the url is valid for, so I try not to do this too often)

Yeah, but then she might kill herself

Beautiful 👏

He did, the room says “WOOD”

That’s an excellent point

That’s because they’re not looking for evidence that shows a crime was committed, they’re looking for evidence of who committed the crime

Your injuries are evidence of a crime, but not necessarily evidence of a specific perpetrator

When a woman claims to have been assaulted, I automatically believe her in regards to how I treat her.

As far as the person she’s accused goes, though, I think it’s pretty easy to understand that nobody should be convicted on the sole evidence of their accuser’s testimony, and I think that should apply to the court of public opinion as well.

It’s a situation where either one person is guilty of a horrible crime, or the other is making false allegations of said crime. In order for both to be “innocent until proven guilty”, you need to assume the allegations are true when interacting with the woman, and assume they’re false while interacting with the accused. It’s really counterintuitive and maybe impossible to do

Free space in the middle

They might find that Trump is in the Epstein files

deleted by creator

Yes please!

Ooh! Is “fried” the new “slammed”?

Foley? Not a clue

But allowing AI slop to be falsely attributed to a dead artist is kinda a no-go for me

I’ve been considering cancelling my Spotify account for a bit, and this has pushed me off the fence! Good riddance to active manufacturers of bad rubbish

I’ve been learning web development, check out what I made! localhost:8080

Said manner being hurricane relief search-and-rescue operations

Dang, that sucks XD

Should have made their frames with zinc alloy instead!

Wouldn’t high-altitude metallic aerosols do the opposite?

I mean, they’re also killing them with bullets when they come to get food aid