• 1 Post
  • 167 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 22nd, 2024

help-circle






  • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzUS education
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It says a LOT about where your faith actually lies if you have to promote a false reality to justify it.

    The irony is that such fundamentalists rely on so much engineering, built on layers of scientific research, for what they do (like eating. And housing. And recruitment. And printing and distributing that textbook), and… yeah. It’d be like a flat-earther in orbit. It’s beyond ironic: it’s just not a possible situation without the help of outsiders refuting that belief.

    I have a lot more respect for the Amish, isolated monks, folks that take their beliefs seriously and consistently in their lifestyle.




  • In Tyler Boebert’s cases, Tyler was never the victim, but always a/the perpetrator, with his mother enabling him.

    Where are you getting that from!? The tabloid article, which lists off crimes like a wreck, a messy theft ring involving drug use, and an apparent case of abuse from his own father, which have plausible but lenient punishments.

    In January 2024, Tyler called the police and said his father was assaulting him at their home. Jayson Boebert was arrested after he allegedly “pushed Tyler to the ground and pushed his thumb into his mouth,” according to a Garfield County arrest affidavit.

    This isn’t some giant crypto con or insider trading from the Trump kids, it sounds more like a struggling young adult to me.

    What if Tyler’s mom wasn’t a politician, but, I dunno, a high level, highly paid engineer? Should his screw ups be under a microscope with “a moral imperative to consider every new crime of Tyler, to be news worthy” just because of what his mom does? And the possibility she used her weight to try and help him? Attention like that is a great way to screw up a struggling adult’s life.



  • No.

    If it’s like nepotism or fraud related to their position of power, yeah.

    But this sounds like domestic trouble not instigated by the politician themself. Bad shit happens in families; I don’t feel comfortable looking at that with a magnifying glass unless they want to share (or, again, it veers into abuse of power), and that includes checking if they’re leaning on police.

    To put it in another perspective, let’s say you are a wholesome politician with a daughter in an abusive relationship. Her partner gets her into drugs. You think that should be plastered all over daily beast or breitbart?

    What if you had a younger kid in trouble? Would you want the entire world breathing down their neck and publicizing every single interaction with law enforcement under a microscope?

    I don’t think stuff like that should be public, even if the cost is missing some political pressure; politicians are human, that’s just an unreasonable expectation of transparency. And if that is the expectation, the only candidates you’ll get are liars and crooks used to skeletons in the closet.







  • Just to add to this, the biggest moat Nvidia has is not transistor density, but their software ecosystem.

    Every since like the GTX 200 series in 2008, Nvidia stuff has been the standard for academic research, and it basically only works on their GPUs. Anything for research is done on Nvidia GPUs, which is tweaked for enterprise deployment on GPUs… if you want it on something else, you basically have to start from scratch. And dump a tremendous amount of brainpower put into optimization.

    AMD’s in an interesting position here because they’ve been making Nvidia GPU competitors for literally decades. Their architectures are actually quite similar, hence it’s easier to ‘emulate’ Nvidia on AMD than pretty much anything else.

    …That being said, the Chinese have made tremendous progress busting out of the Nvidia software ecosystem, hence these chips are actually being used for real work.