

If you are in the UK, here is one.
If you are in the UK, here is one.
Gaggle
Maybe if it wasn’t proliferating into every app and service whether useful or not I wouldn’t hate the living crap out of it. AI has it’s place, I do use it both at work and at home but I don’t need it every where.
Also one of the first victims was customer service pages, and most of them are crap.
I read that using the voice of Morgan Freeman.
Oops, sorry for expressing my opinion.
I could skim read an article at my own pace instead of having to watch for 20m, but whatever.
Perhaps it could have multiple formats so it reaches a wider audience.
I don’t have time to sit and focus on a YouTube video for 20 minutes, so I just simply miss out.
If this was a serious effort then a written version and a website would be available in parallel. If there is one, is there a link?
Keep seeing this around Lemmy. I’m out the loop.
make 0 games ??
Yeah this isn’t correcting auticorrect, it’s disabling it.
Those are some nice looking arms
It’s practical and does it’s job. But the interface is jank. I still use it. But if a modern alternative came along I’d jump.
I expect the agreements for anything happening now or in the near future were cemented several years ago. If the US continues on the track it is on then the number of large new investments may decline.
Wish guacamole didn’t look like total ass. Otherwise a great product.
Looking for a modern alternative though.
Looking at traffic analytics pretty much all our developer staff use chatgpt for 3+ hours a day. I’m not a big fan of using llm for my own development work. I’m proficient in they languages I write in so I don’t need it as much.
I feel like using llm can get you a quick fix but for programming a lot of the results are nonsense. It’s really really well formatted but nonsense still the same. Maybe I can’t use it right. Or I’m asking the wrong questions.
I find it hilarious how when you call it out for being BS it responds with “yes of course, you are right!..” then gives a possibly working or nonsense answer, who knows.
Thank you for the link. Good read
The entire article seems like an attack. The author finds a unique identifier and adds “Russia bad” throughout.
States the information is in cleartext but then explains how everything is encrypted (in transit).
What will the author do if they intercepted any single online stores transfer of credit card details. Also encrypted in transit but Is that also deemed as cleartext? Or is that okay?
I don’t think much new is learnt here. WhatsApp also sends metadata in “cleartext” (not really, as it’s encrypted in transit, but this article called that “cleartext”).
Seeing steam at the top makes me question the list. Likely a hate of DRM rather than privacy
Pee-on-donald