- 3 Posts
- 37 Comments
Don’t lie to me, that 4th game works just fine on a PlayStation 2.
Not that I’m aware of, but hey, there’s a first time for everything.
By all means, feel free to try it. Be sure to post it under Food Crimes though… 😂
Honestly, I’ll try almost anything at least once. Put some olives and mushrooms on that pickle pizza, I’ll probably actually love it!
About the only sort of pizza I wouldn’t even touch… Oyster pizza.
Found Satan
I’ll take this over pineapple pizza any day.
Then again, I’ll put garlic salt on Cheerios.
Yes I’m weird, just not pineapple pizza weird.
1·2 days agoCCITT16/CRC32/SHA256/Etc…
Even wrote my own error correction/validation code.
The only /s is the hashtag.
Yeah, about that…
Have you checked my username?
I’ve tried overclocking practically everything under the sun.
Guess what? If you overclock an AGP port from 100MHz to 133MHz, then your GPU might work just fine, but your hard drive gets corrupted.
There is no such thing as a ‘terrible hash’, it’s either exact or totally wrong.
HashTag #Octothorpe
101·4 days agoSite pings fine on my end, but also receiving 502 bad gateway ☹️
Gulf Coast USA here if that matters.
2·4 days agoI just tried the archived link and apparently NYTimes even blocks the full article from the archive ☹️
Main reason I tried that is because, to my understanding, NYTimes gift articles are only available for 2 weeks or so.
Sigh, I tried anyways, for the good cause. 🤷
Your free trial of Solitare has expired.
Any attempt to renew your subscription will result in a permanent ban from your system.
7·5 days ago👎 ¡ʎlnſ uᴉ sɐɯʇsᴉɹɥƆ ɐᴉlɐɹʇsn∀
Thumbs up from the Northern Hemisphere 👍
Last I checked, Australia isn’t in the Northern Hemisphere…
All I see is *******
I say fill it with spray insulating foam. Whether it’s a real nest or a fake with a hidden camera, works either way 👍
In B4 the ban
It’s a delicate balance of semen content, obviously.
JPEG works in 8x8 pixel blocks, and back in the day, most JPEG images weren’t all that big. Each 8x8 pixel block (64 pixels per block) could easily and quickly be processed as if it were a single pixel.
So if you had a 1024x768 JPEG, then the fast scanning technique would only scan the 128x96 blocks, not necessary to process every single pixel.
Of course the results could never be perfectly accurate, but most images are unique enough that this would be more than sufficient for fast scanning.
I would grade this paper an A+, but I have to deduct 10 points.
You forgot tally whacker