Damn, if they had PII in a public bucket like that it’s criminally negligent. Well, at least it should be but I’m no lawyer

It would be defined as part of the law, hopefully with something reasonable and robust.

Take genocide advocacy - it pretty clearly leads to people getting hurt even if we don’t know exactly who.

They’d be lying if they present an „expert” who isn’t.

It just rubs me the wrong way that the only people with a claim against Fox News for the big lie was the voting machine company over lost profits. We can at least solve the standing issue.

In this context I pretty much mean advocating for genocide or fascism. That and I don’t think you should be able to lie out your ass and call it news.

I think it’s disingenuous to group freedom of thought with speech and expression. Limiting the first is impossible, while every country on earth limits the other two to some degree.

My personal opinion is that you shouldn’t be able to hurt people in stupid, hateful, predictable ways.

Does google let you ban pinterest?

If you use kagi, the AI summary is opt-in. Trigger it with a question mark at the end of your query. I like kagi.

but they aren’t parallel

I like the idea of nixos, but I feel like it makes a bunch of daily sacrifices in order to optimize a task I do once every few years? I hardly ever get a new computer, but I install/uninstall/update/tweak packages on my system all the time. With a dotfile manager and snapshots, I get most of the benefit without any of the drawbacks.

Absolute free speech is overrated. You shouldn’t be able to just lie out your ass and call it news.

The fact that the only people who had any claim against Fox for telling the Big Lie was the fucking voting machine company over lost profits tells you everything you need to know about our country