

I caught it, this was just him doubling down.
I caught it, this was just him doubling down.
The criminals, you don’t have to move out. We’re going to put you in jail where you belong.
Pretext to classify anyone living on the street who refuses to leave DC as a “criminal” and shuffle them off to work camps.
This sounds like a marketing attempt to align us modern Luddites with an already established “out group” to build a public perception against abstaining from planet killing slop generators.
Per the description, where in the region you are born is based on birth rates. That drastically lowers the odds of being born in the water basically everywhere.
And all of those people still need housing which is made more difficult when people own more properties than they need to live in.
I will never understand the fact that there are people who see something and immediately just think “I wonder what AI can do/‘thinks’ about this.”
Well he certainly wasn’t protesting there.
If I get dinged for a dent by an AI maybe the car actually gets dinged with the ball-peen I’ll be carrying for just such a scenario.
Naw, text layers in a .xcf is where it’s at.
Conversations about impeachment just aren’t complete without the man who was impeached the best and the most!
Or set the public instance to public discussion about women’s stuff and set up a private instance with a women’s only application process that is advertised on the public instance.
There’s value in women’s only spaces, and there’s value in spaces for fathers, husbands, brothers, boyfriends, and sons to ask about women’s stuff. By arranging the communities as described they can keep discoverability, exclusivity, AND can stop getting forbidden comments from the public on their public forum.
If the community is private you might have a point, but there are very public women’s only communities on this platform who’s conversations show up in the aggregate feeds–that’s not just “conversing amongst themselves.”
Is this about the public community, Women’s stuff, federated on the public fediverse who’s posts get aggregated to the public all feed and which is accessed by a diverse set of software solutions that may or may not force the community rules to be visible before viewing post content?
I try not to engage cause I know about the community, but golly, I can’t imagine how a man might stumble upon that and interact.
My family always told me that I’d grow more conservative and want a family of my own as I grow older.
As I aged I went from ambivalence toward politics and kids to decidedly anti-conservative and anti-kid.
You know your own feelings on the matter more than your family does, and letting your family dictate how you live your life will lead to resentment and misery.
Relying on a small child to stay on the ground in order to not accidentally kill themselves is a great way to end up with a dead kid.
Furniture should be anchored to a wall, guns locked in safes with the safety enabled and ammo removed, drugs in child resistant packaging locked in a cabinet, drawers and cabinets secured, etc.
Kids climb stuff, get into things, find things they shouldn’t, AND they emulate what they see their parents do. Putting something out of reach is nowhere near secure enough.
Guns should also be left in the open for children to play with since we’re on the topic of easy things we can change to threaten the life of those that may not know better yet!
A button to toggle is good design, but it should just default to your system preferences.
If a website wants to run ads that’s fine, I’ll just remove them. If they want to gate their content behind a paywall that’s fine, I’ll just make a determination about whether or not what they offer is worth it.
Removing ads is not “breaking a website” if anything it’s the exact opposite–restoring a cleaner layout, faster loading, less privacy invasion, and a reduced chance of malware.