500 greater than steps a day.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Okay, knowing that you view it as neutral helps. For some reason I didn’t get that.
(I doubt it would have been used as an example of hypocrisy otherwise),
The drinking example was that blarghly was clearly criticizing other for their choices of what they put in their bodies because it is unhealthy while ignoring blarghly is also putting something in their body (alcohol) which could easily be criticized for being unhealthy. blarghly was demonstrating “Rules for thee, but not for me”. That rubbed me the wrong way.
I get that it’s meant to pick out hypocrisy, however I keep reading a deeper implication. Maybe I’m just reading things that aren’t there, but if drinking was virtuous, the right thing to do, would it be hypocritical for blarghly to drink? I don’t read it that way. I interpret that it’s treated as hypocrisy to mean that drinking is bad, that blarghly probably shouldn’t drink.
Maybe I misread this interaction, and maybe it’s not my business, but this reads to me as a judgement on blarghly for both implying judgment on other people and for drinking (I doubt it would have been used as an example of hypocrisy otherwise), then I read it as about how you make the superior decision to not judge people for drinking.
yistdaj@pawb.socialto Technology@lemmy.world•Switzerland plans surveillance worse than USEnglish8·30 days agoAs much as it’s dumb, many other places (such as Australia, where I live) are similar at this point.
I imagine some parasites would benefit from being delicious.