I have no problem with Michael being the focus of Disco, but yeah, there wasn’t any cohesion in much of the overall storyline. (With all of its problems, I still enjoyed Disco until just after they returned from the “other place”. [Trying not to spoil])
For the life of me, I still don’t know what they were trying to prove with massive pivot on the Klingons. They should have made those characters a separate race and used them as a first step in positive Klingon/Human unification, in stereotypical Start Trek fashion. (I mean, the timelines and lore was so broken by Disco, anything goes at that point.)
I have no problem with Michael being the focus of Disco, but yeah, there wasn’t any cohesion in much of the overall storyline. (With all of its problems, I still enjoyed Disco until just after they returned from the “other place”. [Trying not to spoil])
For the life of me, I still don’t know what they were trying to prove with massive pivot on the Klingons. They should have made those characters a separate race and used them as a first step in positive Klingon/Human unification, in stereotypical Start Trek fashion. (I mean, the timelines and lore was so broken by Disco, anything goes at that point.)
The thing with the Klingons was likely trying to explain why the TOS Klingons were just guys with curly hair.
I like the DS9 time travel episode where Worf says, yes those are Klingons, and no we’re not going to talk about it.