Writing on X, the Republican politician said she was creating legislation that would make “the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity” a felony.

“I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,” she wrote. “It will be a felony offense.”

She added: “We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering.”

    • Chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 days ago

      Express purpose probably saves them. The express purpose is to vent externalities

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 days ago

      It would be beautiful if this dimwit bumbled her way into making the world a better place…but we’re probably in the wrong timeline for that

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    15 days ago

    I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,”

    So carbon dioxide? Guess we better shut down the coal power plants. MTG says so!

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      She will get reelected by the citizens of northeast Georgia because they vote.

      Do you?

      (More of a comment to the average reader, not an attack on OP)

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        She’ll be re-elected because her district is very white, very rural, and very disinformed by sources like Fox News, Newsmax, and conservative AM talk radio. On the rare occasions that the democrats bother to run someone in her district they tend to get less than 30% of the vote. And, if there were ever a danger that the seat might be close, the borders would be adjusted to ensure it stays safely Republican.

        The problem goes much deeper than voting or not voting.

  • lipilee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’ll rotfl my mao off when this law will turn out to accidentally punish fossil fuel and chemical companies dispersing chemicals or substances into the atmosphere and altering weather, also known as climate change.

    • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      You just know they won’t touch those companies because how else are they gonna get their bribe money?

      • Xande@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        I bet some megaMAGAmorons will embark on a quest to prove their nonsense right… and in the end find out it was the same companies that polluted the air, water and soil whos CEOs are buddybuddy with their beloved leader…

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Laws aren’t auto-enforcing magic. Any place that fossil fuel companies violations of a stupid law like this (written for purely performative reasons) simply wouldn’t be enforced upon.

      Similarly, if the law allows for civil action, a multitude of reasons would be conjured on demand explaining why the lawsuit couldn’t move forward against fossil fuel companies. If it managed to move through district courts, it would simply wind up on the supreme court docket and they would again conjure up some reasons why the suit was invalid.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    15 days ago

    I can see how people in the future could turn this one around on to oil and plastic companies. We should probably not stop this one.

  • Octavio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    15 days ago

    The only “weather modification machines” are fossil fuel powered energy plants. We should join together with MTG to outlaw them.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      I mean, technically we’ve been playing around with cloud seeding and such which is about the only thing I can think of that would even come close to what she is talking about. But it’s by no means a common occurrence.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 days ago

    I thought she’d prioritize dealing with sharknado attacks but there we have it.

  • 74 183.84@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I haven’t read the article or comments yet. Just the post title. I am afraid of the amount of brain cells I am about to lose. I’m going in, will update in a moment.

    Edit: what the fuck did I just read. A new bill to stop a conspiracy theory? MTG is dumb as a stone and I can’t comprehend how she is still in office

    • guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      MTG is dumb as a stone and I can’t comprehend how she is still in office

      Her voters are dumber than she is.

      That’s how she is still in office.

    • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Could the bill be used to base measures on that help combat climate change? Sometimes idiots are actually useful.

      • 74 183.84@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Could it? Possibly. Would it? Probably not. At least not with big daddi T/ republicans in office. They deny the effects of pollutants in the atmosphere so there is no weather modification taking place (according to them). Considering that trump is taking away tax credits for solar and wind and is increasing leasing and tax credits for oil, gas, and coal industries I don’t think this bill will provide much benefit for the climate

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 days ago

    Maybe they’ll unintentionally outlaw pollution like when the Republicans accidentally legalized cannabis in 2018

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      Sadly, all it will take is some CEO to publicly state “I didn’t intend to pollute the environment. I dumped dangerous chemicals into nature because I wanted more money. Yes, I knew my actions would modify the weather, as this legislation states. But that was not my express purpose. My purpose was to be able to afford my 17th yacht so my peers would accept me.”

      Perfectly legal.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 days ago

      I honestly can’t tell whether her intent is to block any counter-climate change projects or if this is just a dumb chemtrails thing.

      I mean, I assume it’s chemtrails, given the source, but it could easily be a “I like the smell of forest fires, and you’ll reduce hurricane intensity over my dead body.” Given the source.

      • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        THEY will tell you when YOU broke the law. Then “deport” you to a private funded prison in a foreign country.

        They embrace the invisible. You have no defense against their claims.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    All this is gonna stop is cloud seeding, since that is literally the only way in which we manipulate the weather.

    Well… On purpose, I mean. If this has the side effect of outlawing all greenhouse emissions because it’s altering the weather in form of making shit hotter, that’s a win.

    Edit: Also I am reminded of the time some PR lady for HAARP said the array can manipulate the weather because, technically, it could punch a hole in clouds directly above it. Which I thought was just stupid, even as a joke, because they were trying to squash the rumors that it was some kind of hurricane machine.

    • razzazzika@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      You know it ain’t. This is her trying to ban some conspiracy theory non existent weather device, just like the space laser she was crying about a couple years ago.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      What’s the worst that can happen, farmers face droughts and companies can’t allow relief due to legality so the crops just die and we have food shortages? I mean that just hurts the farmers and the non-rich… So no fucks they will give

  • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    Are they literally just laying the groundwork to frame Democrats for weather modifications so they can blame all of climate change on us and create a modern day witch hunt? Seriously? How the fuck is anyone stupid enough to believe this shit?

    • III@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      How the fuck is anyone stupid enough to believe this shit?

      The American “education” system… that’s how. Conservatives paid good money over the decades to build this level of general stupidity.