• macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    bottom, as we only can see the treads not the risers (that small inset underneath a step).

    • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And you can see the wear on the treads. plus the handrail mount in the top left would be at a very inconvenient height if we were looking from the bottom up

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think it’s bottom too but I don’t agree with your reasoning, I’ve seen steps without that bit.

      Edit: actually now I think top, I’ve been convinced by the daylight argument plus the realization that is a single mattress folded in half (I previously thought it’s two mattresses).

      Edit: changed my mind again, made a top level comment

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        How does the single mattress in half bit make you think it’s at the top? If it were at the top, the force of the mattress trying to straighten itself out would push it down the stairs. Much more likely the mattress was pushed/ tossed/ fell down the stairs and got folded in that position, imo.

        Edit: the shadows are also indicative of it being at the bottom: light source from above and and from the sides at the base of the stairs, either from an open door or window. Shadow cast from the door light source being cancelled by the light source from above the stairs.

    • YoFrodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s the top of the stairs because in the top left of thr image you can see the banister support. If the mattresses were at the bottom then the angle of that support would be different

          • deranger@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Well, my house has electricity and the stairs do not have that indentation at all. I could take a picture of the steps from the bottom or the top and aside from the wear marks on the treads, you can’t see a difference.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some stairs don’t have different looking risers, but you’re still correct because you can see wear marks from steps on the carpet.

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s white and gold!

    All joking aside, most stairs that I know had some sort of overhang, which we don’t see in this picture, so I’ll venture to say that we are looking down. The mattress is at the bottom of the stairs.

  • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bottom. The spacing/size of the stairs is the biggest clue. If we were at the bottom, it would indicate that the stairs are very tall and not very wide. As others have said, the worn carpet is also an indicator, as the carpet on the side of the stairs would not be worn. It would also likely have something sticking out like most stairs, not just flat.

  • TabbsTheBat@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Up and down are manmade constructs, so I assign the direction thatthe mattress is as the top of the stairs. Move the mattress to the other end? Well that’s the top now, just how it has to be /j

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I think it is the bottom of the top of the stairs because of the lighting to the bottom left of the mattress. That should be in shadow from the mattress if it was at the bottom of the stairs.

  • cooljimy84@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    From the wear patten on the carpet I would say bottom, but the handle to the side makes me think top !..

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The handrail probably has the hangers perpendicular to the railing instead of plumb to the ground. Just the cheapest ones you can get.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a curtain rod to a window midway up the stairs. We’re looking down a flight of steep older stairs. The mattress is lit by the window that is (mostly) under the rod, and by an open door at the bottom of the stairs.

    • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think that’s a heavy duty banister bracket, like this one:

      white heavy duty banister bracket

      Some banister brackets have a swivel type arrangement so that the bracket can be vertical underneath the handrail, no matter the angle of the handrail. Basic heavy duty brackets like this one are completely fixed in orientation, so they’re installed with the vertical support at an angle to support the handrail. I suspect the bracket in the photo is at a 45ish degree angle and only looks vertical due to the perspective. The banister has been deliberately cropped out of the photo to make the perspective as confusing as possible.

      Personally I think the photo was taken from the top of the stairs looking down, based on the wear in the carpet.

  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The biggest factor IMO is something no one mentioned yet: we can only see one face of each step (either the top or the wall). If a photo is taken from the bottom, we would almost always be able to see the tops of the first few steps, which isn’t visible here. If a photo is taken from the top, the walls would pretty much never be visible (if they were, you could also see the photographer’s feet).

    Therefore, this photo is only consistent with a photo taken from the top.

    It is possible that this is an extremely long flight of stairs or that the photo was taken from a deliberately deceptive angle, but if that’s the case I have to say it was expertly done, because I am CERTAIN that we are looking from the top and the mattress is at the bottom.

    • ganksy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly right. The steps sit on the risers. If you can’t see both it’s from the top.

    • supamanc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Nah, the hanger for the banister is very common, it protudes from the wall and turns up into the bottom of the handrail, therfore we are looking from the bottom up.

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s going at an angle, not up. It’s 90° from the handrail itself, which is sloped to match the incline of the stairs.