• Devolution@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is utterly absurd. Support genocide or be denied emergency aid. At this rate, communist China makes more sense.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    if the federal government can condition federal funds this way, then states can condition their states contribution to federal taxes

    • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Employers and employees are the ones paying those taxes. If this could work at all, it’d only be taxes from businesses that don’t cross state lines. And I suspect feds would raid even those and arrest the owners.

      And unfortunately there’s a long history of this, like denying interstate highway funds to states that wouldn’t raise the drinking age.

  • chellewalker@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, from what we saw in the Texas flooding, it seems like no one is getting that disaster relief regardless of how hard they support genocide.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Aside: I love how evenly Reuters reports this crazy situation.

    Not that they’re always perfect, but that’s how journalism is done (even with the paywall, unfortunately…)