• Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    What do you mean no advances in the last 70 years?! In the last decade scientists detected gravity waves and imaged an actual real black hole. Also they’ve been steadily chipping at quantum gravity, give it a couple decades they’ll get there.

    unless we cancel all the funding

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Aren’t the first two things just experimental proves of Einsteins relativity theory from over 100 years ago?

      I don’t know about quantum gravity though.

          • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            As a layman who’s into physics it took me like a decade to understand what is “wrong” with them. No educational string theory video is prefaced with “Hey this is an old unprovable theory that is essentially dead in the water, but it has some cool math tricks and is fun to think about” as they should be.

            • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              PBS Spacetime’s approach was a pair of videos titled “Why String Theory is True” and “Why String Theory is False” and between them that pretty much put it to bed for me. cool math, cool worldbuilding, call me when they make a testable prediction. until then it goes on the scrap pile with aether and phlogiston.

  • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gravity is just a side effect of the fundamental laziness of all things. Causality moves slower near mass, so it’s kind of relaxing to move towards it. That’s why everyone does it.

    PS: There is actually a SciShow Spacetime video about gravity being an emergent property instead of a fundamental force. And no I didn’t get this from ChatGPT, I’m just that dumb when it comes to advanced physics haha.

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    57k a year is a decent salary if you live in the UK.

    A seasoned postdoc could expect to make 55K max. A professor a bit more.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      57k€/year is a professional’s salary in Italy.

      Average is 32k€

      With 57k€ you can afford to live comfortably, even get yourself a roomy flat, which is unusual for single individuals.

      *Exceptions may apply, see Milan or other big cities

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Postdocs are definitely not getting 55k in the UK except maybe if something like medicine is special? The range is like 36-45ish.

    • macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That is not a decent salary, that is so low. I made almost that much just out of college in the U.S. Once I made it just over 10 years as EE, I was double that.

  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is wholly inaccurate. We do know what causes gravity; time dilation near matter (at least for smaller objects like the Earth). What we don’t know is why gravity, because we have yet to produce a model that matches both quantum effects and cosmic behaviors like gravity and dark matter/energy.

    “Quantum gravity” is the general term for what solution would describe something that ties these two universes of behavior together. The process of decoherence isn’t terribly well understood as far as carrying effects clear from particle scale to cosmic scale.

    Even then, some of the mathematical explanations from current models are plausible, but unproven.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    While reading this I had a sudden flash of inspiration in which I saw clearly exactly how gravity works, but then when I started typing I forgot again. It’s quite frustrating

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I find it quite marvellous that the universe contains unexplainable stuff like this, actually.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It is what make it risky to jump from the Burj Kalifa, at least on the last meter.

    • nomecks@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Wouldn’t the electromagnetic force be what makes jumping from the Burj Khalifa risky? It’s not the fall that kills you, it’s the sudden stop.