• ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’ve installed Arch manually exactly once. (Just for the bragging rights, lol)

    My go to way is just installing EndeavourOS. It’s basically Arch, but with a nicer installer and reasonable defaults.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Once is all you need to be fair. After that you’re the exact person who should be using archinstall.

    • dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I use Endeavour, btw. Nah, I don’t think it’ll catch one.

      I’m super stoked to be on an Arch-based system, but things have been so easy I have earned no bragging rights what-so-ever with it.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I got to where it expected me to partition the drive manually and noped out. I was doing that in the 90’s when I compiled my own kernel. Ain’t nobody got time for that today.

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I did it once, wrote down all the commands I used in order and then made my own install script. It was a great learning experience

      • festnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        i did that once… watched a video of some guy installing it, wrote down every single command, did it myself, it worked! then the clock system broke and i tried to fix it, couldn’t do it because dumb, and reinstalled it. exact same commands as before, but it didn’t work, no clue why

        then i did the same with some other youtube video, until i just decided to use an arch based distro with an installer

        now i just see people talking about archinstall and i’m like… i could’ve done it with one command? why did nobody tell me??? or did i just ignore everyone who told me? am i stupid???

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Installing Arch manually is not hard, and there are plenty of step-by-step guides.

    Figuring out what you need next and then managing this mess is more complicated.

    Source: I installed Arch manually btw

    • Samsy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Years ago I installed it manually, too. For learning, yes. But regularly, no. The archinstall package is easy but a newbie would struggle there, too. It’s just a faster way for skilled Linux Users.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Newbie Linux users shouldn’t go with Arch to begin with, even Endeavour or Garuda, unless they’re seeing it as a learning experience and have an IT background behind their back.

        It’s not worth it for the average user, and honestly - even for most veteran users for that matter.

        The great power of Arch comes with great responsibility to manage your system properly.

  • MyNamesTotallyRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Installing arch without archinstall is way too much fucking work. I’d much rather spend time fixing the 10% greater likelihood of encountering issues post install than doing all that fucking bullshit manually. The command line is better for a lot of things but configuring partitions and mount points is not one of them. I demand a fuckin gui for that stuff.

    • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The rationale in the OP is that with archinstall, an inexperienced user will have no idea where to even begin diagnosing any issues post install. Whereas installing manually is sort of a barrier to entry that ensures you know what you’re doing.

      • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s a stupid reason to make an installation as painful as possible. I can follow the installation wiki but I just don’t have time for this. And an inexperienced user can follow the wiki or another how-to and finish the installation but still be lost if something breaks later on.

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not being made “as painful as possible”, it’s just manual. Arch isn’t a distro that’ll preconfigure things for you so everything’s plug’n’play, it’s a distro that’ll give you access to everything and the power to use it however you like, but with that comes the expectation and responsibility to manage those things.

          Installing arch manually is simply a good lesson in how your system is set up, what parts it’s made up of, in part because you’re free to remove and switch out those parts.

          And sure, there’s no magic bullet to make sure a new user understands everything they did, but I think in the end, if you’re not willing to read, learn and troubleshoot, you might just want a different distro.

    • Mio@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is why arches based distos are taking off. They help with picking packages etc to save time.