Timestamp to the point in the video: https://youtu.be/2S-WJN3L5eo?t=3287 although would not recommend watching it with sound on.
- 2 Posts
- 17 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 20th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
9·10 hours agoYou’re right, best I can tell, WSJ only described the image, but has not published it. Here is an archive of the WSJ piece that Trump is suing about: https://archive.is/IUWMu
2·21 hours agoHow about a nice game of chess?
13·21 hours agoStill a disgrace that the officers who actually shot her saw no jail time, and the piece of shit who killed her actually got hired at another police department afterwards.
Not sure if this is the video you’re referencing, but it explained it for me: https://youtu.be/MzwY7ii582Y
2·2 days agoIf they have the rights to distribute it and can seed it, than what is the crime? I would have to imagine that if a studio wants to limit the spread of pirated material, hiring a firm who will distribute and spread the content the studios are looking to limit is counterproductive. IANAL but i think that if a studio were to take someone to court for piracy and it was discovered that the studio (or a hired firm) was legally providing the content to the defendant, it would be a huge hole in the case, and be grounds for dismissal.
Private trackers usually have a limit of active torrents you can have depending on your ratio tier. Sitting on every torrent in a private tracker for one user would be a huge red flag, so the only way to have it work would be to have many accounts. Even then, unless they’re seeding content, they will probably be kicked if their upload is 0 bytes after a month or whatever interval accounts are purged.
Sure, there are probably some studios going after high profile torrents on private trackers, but thinking they would be monitoring thousands of torrents is a stretch.
4·2 days agoNever underestimate how much of the media and society love to see schadenfreude. It’s basically escapism from the daily onslaught of terrible news all the time.
You’re right to call out that marriage != monogamy. The comment should have been:
If you don’t want to be monogamous don’t get
marriedinto a monogamous relationship. It’s an easy solution.
The thing I don’t quite get is what happened during Biden’s term that this couldn’t have been brought to light then. Sure the FBI was investigating and charging the Jan. 6th rioters, but surely they could have also raised charges against high profile people they knew who were clients of Epstein. Seems to me either there really isn’t anything to go on with his death and clients, or both Biden and Trump’s DOJ are suppressing going after people, maybe for different reasons?
learned from the Bureau of Prisons is every night they redo that video. … So, every night the video is reset, and every night should have the same minute missing."
If this was a plot point in a mission impossible movie or some court drama, it would be panned as lazy and unoriginal. At best, this would be negligence on the people running the Bureau of Prisons as this was not standard for 2009 technology, let alone 2019. This smells like hiding behind technical BS from someone who doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
You underestimate my power
Taking things too seriously, fruits and vegetables are generally much smaller, and can not speak and hold a baseball bat.
I refuse to use the Zoom client on my computer and instead use the web client. There might not be 1:1 feature parity, but it’s never been a problem for me with other people.
That’s bs and also reminds me of a joke about two mathematicians at a bar:
longish math joke
Two mathematicians are in a bar. The first one says to the second that the average person knows very little about basic mathematics. The second one disagrees, and claims that most people can cope with a reasonable amount of math.
The first mathematician goes off to the washroom, and in his absence the second calls over the waitress. He tells her that in a few minutes, after his friend has returned, he will call her over and ask her a question. All she has to do is answer one third x cubed.
She repeats “one thir – dex cue”?
He repeats “one third x cubed”.
She says, “one thir dex cuebd”?
Yes, that’s right, he says. So she agrees, and goes off mumbling to herself, “one thir dex cuebd…”.
The first guy returns and the second proposes a bet to prove his point, that most people do know something about basic math. He says he will ask the blonde waitress an integral, and the first laughingly agrees. The second man calls over the waitress and asks “what is the integral of x squared?”.
The waitress says “one third x cubed” and while walking away, turns back and says over her shoulder “plus a constant!”
Just remember if you need to do anything with subtitles in FFMpeg, you need to install libass
I have seen this picture, but it has not been released by the WSJ, CNN, NYT, etc. The WSJ article describes the letter and this matches the description, but this is a recreation based on the description. What OP is asking for is why can’t they find a scan of the actual letter and the reason is because it hasn’t been published.