• HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Even the billionaires would be better off without billinaires. It their relative ranking was the same they would still have more money than they could spend but it would now come with clean air, water, land, better infrastructure, a healthier world, happier people to interact with.

  • Fives@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    The super-wealthy are a cancer on society, and just like cancer, they suck up all of the resources while killing the patient.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Bill Ackman, a billionaire hedge fund manager who has backed President Donald Trump in the past, on Thursday pledged to use his money to bankroll a challenger to Mamdani in the general election.

    Case in point.

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Imagine life was a game. You lived for 2025 years. You worked 260 days / year. You made the median US salary.

    You would need to relive that process 3,145 times to match an Oligarch.

    That amount of wealth is unethical while humanity suffers. No one can really fathom “1b dollars.”

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      All these guys just say what the public wants to hear before election.

      Behind the scenes, this guy wants to be a billionarie, and the way there is to make a political career, saying whatever is popular with the voters.

      There is no risk of being shot because all this guy is doing is trying to get popular, just like every other political guy before him. He wont be able to get rid of billionaries even if he wanted to.

        • mrmanager@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          I thought he was a nominee? Article says that anyway. But still, there is zero chance that any of these guys will make any changes that are helping the ordinary people and hurts billionaries. Its a system where they have money and power and most of the citizens do not.

          People are desperate for hope, and thats why his strategy is working. It is simular to Trumps own strategy also. They all come out and act as if they represent the ordinary people, and everyone buys it every time.

              • vxx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                25 days ago

                Inflation is as 2.4%. A much as I hate to say it, it isnt that had.

                • confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  Inflation doesn’t feel great but the cost of groceries is a different metric. Grocery prices are still up and rising faster than inflation.

                  In my opinion groceries probably should cost more but rent and several other expenses should be far lower. How long ago was it that budgeting 1/3 of income for food was considered normal?

  • huppakee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’m not against people having money, but to have a thousand times more than most people can make in their entire lifetime is just taking it too far. There should be a cap after which you pay 90% tax or something

    • Lung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Problem is billionaires don’t make “income” and it’s quite difficult to even know what they own, let alone how to tax something like unrealized gains on stock holdings that they are using as leverage to get loans

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        At some point, somebody convinced people that unrealized gains were not actually income because you don’t know for sure that you’d make that money, and I think that was a bad idea. Maybe unrealized gains aren’t 1:1 the same thing as income, but the calculations of an income equivalent aren’t going to be complicated.

          • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            This exactly. At some threshold of worth, you should get taxed an amount based on your worth that will be big enough to force you to realize some gains in order to pay it.

            • bus_factor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              The issue with realizing the gains is that you have to relinquish control of your company bit by bit. However, you could have the company (which you likely control) give out dividends, or you could use the stock as collateral for a loan. Or just pay yourself a bigger salary.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Before the oligarchs say this is “violence”.

    This can be done peacefully. Just enact a law that taxes everything above like 999 million (or a fewer amount, to be debated on), and if you don’t comply, that’s tax evasion and you go to jail. Complelete peaceful (other than the tax-person we’d have to send to arrest the rich for non-complance), comply and everyone is happy.

    Voila, no more billionaires, and that wealth redistributed will let everyone become a millionaire. Everyone is happy, maybe the 1% cries that they now have a few less yachts and mansions, but like, they can still enjoy that one house, same as everyone else would also have.

    • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      But could this really be done? As far as I’ve understood, billionaires typically don’t have a billion liquidized and ready for spending. Rather, their value is distributed in ownership of several companies. How would the 100% taxes on ownership in companies be applied?

      Don’t get me wrong, I would love to see it work, but I feel like it’s a lot more complicated than stated. And if a good way of applying those taxes would be introduced, I’m sure the billionaires would either find new ways to make the money untouchable or personally move to a country with looser tax laws.

      • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        That’s what conservatives always claim. Most of them won’t move and even if they do, good riddance. Simply tax their wealth beforehand.