• CXORA@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    12 days ago

    Jesus never wrote any of it down, neither did anyone who ever met Jesus, as far as we can tell.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      Thank you for this! I’m now going to add “Objection: Hearsay!” To my list of “How to argue with Christians using the Bible”.

      It will slot in very well right after the “Jesus said we don’t have to follow Leviticus” arguments.

      • CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        Christianity has a very rich scholarly history. If you find yourself discussing it often, i would absolutely recommend looking up some of the real scholars on the matter (rather than listening to me or any other random person online).

        But also, you’re welcome :)

    • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      You have to exist to be able to write stuff down, so that’s probably why he didn’t.

      • CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        There probably was a historical jesus.

        Otherwise I don’t see why Christians would have made up the whole trip to Bethlehem story about a census which we have no record of. They needed the real jesus to have some reason to be in the prophecied place.

        • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          At that time in that region there were a lot of cults. It’s very likely that the Jesus figure from the bible is an amalgamation of multiple cult leaders from that period.

          • CXORA@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Of course, by the definition of cult used at that time all monotheistic and henotheistic religions are cults.

            • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Yes they are. The only difference between a cult and a religion is the number of followers.

              • CXORA@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Well no, in the first century a cult is a group which worships a single god. Like the various mystery cults that thrived in ancient Rome.