Human life expectancy is a statistical measure of the estimate of the average remaining years of life at a given age.
What you described would be the median, not average. Those can be very far apart, a good example is the distribution of wealth. Put 10 homeless people in a room with Bill Gates and everyone’s a billionaire on average.
Average life expectancy can be misleading. I did the maths with my grandfather’s siblings and him, they had an average life expectancy of like 50. However two died before their first birthday, one died shortly after, then the next one to die was like 58, and the rest were 80-90.
The median is an average. There’s generally three types of average, Mean (what you’re talking about), Median (the one they’re talking about), and Mode (the one rarely talked about).
Sorry for being nitpicky and thanks for naming them all. I just assume the term average is equivalent to mean average in peoples heads. For uneven distributions, like wealth or life expectancy are I assume, mean average in itself just wouldn’t be a useful measurement.
Even Excel has a function called “average”, whereas R uses the “mean” function for the same thing. Interestingly, R doesn’t have a function called “average”, because that term is far too ambiguous to statisticians. I think that summarizes pretty well who these tools were made for.
US public schools taught me that mean=average and the others were themselves, not that average describes any process to find a “normal” value. Just throwing that out there so people know why the conversation above happens so frequently.
The very wiki article quoted says average to mean mean (made explicit later). OP showerthought was calculating life expectancy in a way different than commonly understood. The first nitpick was correct.
From Wikipedia:
What you described would be the median, not average. Those can be very far apart, a good example is the distribution of wealth. Put 10 homeless people in a room with Bill Gates and everyone’s a billionaire on average.
Average life expectancy can be misleading. I did the maths with my grandfather’s siblings and him, they had an average life expectancy of like 50. However two died before their first birthday, one died shortly after, then the next one to die was like 58, and the rest were 80-90.
The median is an average. There’s generally three types of average, Mean (what you’re talking about), Median (the one they’re talking about), and Mode (the one rarely talked about).
Average has a definition of being the mean, median, or mode, BUT it also has a definition that it is a synonym for the mean.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/average
Sorry for being nitpicky and thanks for naming them all. I just assume the term average is equivalent to mean average in peoples heads. For uneven distributions, like wealth or life expectancy are I assume, mean average in itself just wouldn’t be a useful measurement.
Yes, when most people say average, they mean mean. Few people I’ve met know the other concepts even exist.
Even Excel has a function called “average”, whereas R uses the “mean” function for the same thing. Interestingly, R doesn’t have a function called “average”, because that term is far too ambiguous to statisticians. I think that summarizes pretty well who these tools were made for.
US public schools taught me that mean=average and the others were themselves, not that average describes any process to find a “normal” value. Just throwing that out there so people know why the conversation above happens so frequently.
The very wiki article quoted says average to mean mean (made explicit later). OP showerthought was calculating life expectancy in a way different than commonly understood. The first nitpick was correct.