SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomonthly challengesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square108linkfedilinkarrow-up1689arrow-down126
arrow-up1663arrow-down1imagemonthly challengesopuli.xyzSSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square108linkfedilink
minus-squareNikls94@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·2 days ago no, I prefer the sex no, I hate when I can’t fly freestyle yes no, not enough ok is easy, I have a dog doable not on this economy
minus-squarebluecat_OwO@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 days agothey meant less than 500 steps a day smh
minus-squareNikls94@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·2 days agoWho writes it that way??? It’s read out “500 less than steps a day” Favorite subject of them grammar not was.
minus-squarebluecat_OwO@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agotechnically the symbol is parsed as “greater than”. So syntactically they are not wrong, but we are not accustomed to reading it like that
minus-squareAlfredolin@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoI think <500 steps a day is meant here.
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 days ago500> steps and <500 steps means the exact same thing though.
minus-squareAlfredolin@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoYes thank you. However the comment above seems to imply the opposite.
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoYes, that part is right, above comment doesn’t know how to read ‘greater than’ symbols.
minus-squaremrgoosmoos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 days agoYes that’s what they wrote in the OP
they meant less than 500 steps a day
smh
Who writes it that way???
It’s read out “500 less than steps a day”
Favorite subject of them grammar not was.
500 greater than steps a day.
technically the symbol is parsed as “greater than”. So syntactically they are not wrong, but we are not accustomed to reading it like that
I think <500 steps a day is meant here.
500> steps and <500 steps means the exact same thing though.
Yes thank you. However the comment above seems to imply the opposite.
Yes, that part is right, above comment doesn’t know how to read ‘greater than’ symbols.
Yes that’s what they wrote in the OP