Welp…

    • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      Bro as a lefty I’m so scared of this America Party bro. Like we really won’t be able to beat them frfr. If republicans have the Trump Party and the America Party it’ll be like they’re twice as strong. They definitely won’t just start taking sides and splitting the vote so that their already fake “majority” completely falls apart. And the muskrat definitely wouldn’t be dumb enough to try to rig an election so his puppet candidate beats a Trump Party candidate prompting Dump or SCOTUS to crack down on election rigging. That would never in a million years happen bc the America Party is gonna totally be the people’s party bro

      /s just in case

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s Musk so he’ll probably rebrand them as NaXis.

      Maybe enough MAGAts will join him that it will split the vote and it will get easier to get people with basic human decency elected. That is assuming we continue to have elections.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 days ago

      The only good thing of that is that the otherwise shitty FPTP system will make him and Trump go for each others throat.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    I just want to remind anyone thinking that this is a good thing because it will siphon off voters from the Republican Party - Elon Musk is only doing this because Trump cut the EV mandate from the Big Bullshit Bill and didn’t appoint his guy to NASA. No matter what he says about spending or debt ceilings, he doesn’t care about any of it and was in the loop the entire time that legislation was being crafted. He’s still only in this for himself, just as he was when he gleefully threw a Nazi salute on stage thinking he just got everything he could ever want when he bought the president his office.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Sure, that’s fine, I just don’t want people to lose sight of the bigger picture here. Musk is not an altruist. He’s not the good guy all of a sudden. He didn’t grow a conscience after falling out with Trump.

        If this political party ever gets off the ground, which it probably won’t, Musk will always have a controlling interest in it. He will never ever let the party move away from enabling and enacting his agenda, and his alone. He doesn’t give a single shit or a wipe about helping Americans. He wants to protect his fortune by taking control of the government apparatus to end regulations or investigations that impede the companies he is in charge of. That’s it.

        I certainly hope that Democrats will see this for the nakedly transparent political maneuver that it is, and not get swept up in the idea of a 3rd party founded and controlled by a billionaire will bring any kind of meaningful change to the system. And I believe they will - we rejected Bloomberg and Steyer in 2020 because they were out-of-touch billionaires who tried to buy their way into the party, and I think that Democrats are not so easily fooled by the obvious bad faith rich cunts who try to buy their way into the public zeitgeist. I just worry that people will see this move by Musk as “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” and shift closer to his values as a result. He might be the enemy of your enemy, but he’s still an an enemy as far as I’m concerned.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 days ago

          This isn’t what anyone is celebrating.

          They don’t think for a second that Musk will do anything positive.

          What they’re hoping for is republicans to split somewhere near the middle, some in support of MAGAts and some in support of Musk, which could lead to more people voting for a democrat than a republican. Votes that would have gone toward a MAGAt will go to Musk. That is the prayer.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 days ago

          Nobody who actually cares about others thinks Musk is the good guy. This is strictly an evil vs. evil situation.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      As much as I fucking hate Musk, he does understand two things:

      1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support
      2. Funneling money from the government to billionaires is the worst thing for an economy

      What I find fucking mind-blowing is that this idiot is selling a shoddy EV and solar product at premium costs to other idiots, but very much aligned with Democrats on the two points above. Not only did he back the wrong horse, he straight up accidentally got on the wrong horse, and rode it threw towns away from where he was living very comfortably.

      Now this fucking moron needs to invent new ways to make Tesla appealing to the “normies” because nobody is buying his bullshit stalling tactics or premium pricing for sub-par products.

      I’ve got my popcorn ready, but the siphoning of votes away from Trump is just the butter on top.

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        I dont see how you can draw that conclusion for item 2. He claims to care about the deficit, not funelling money to billionaires. Belive me, he would have you living under a bridge eating gruel before he would touch anything that affects his wealth.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago
        1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support

        in not sure about that… imo EVs would be relatively comparable if ICE vehicles and oil didn’t have massive subsidies at every stage from governments… more if negative externalities were properly accounted for

        or maybe not: in australia we have a fuel excise and EV credit and they’re still pretty expensive relative to ICE

        • dickalan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          I know you meant internal combustion engine, but it gave me a pause because I thought you were talking about ice agents

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            i absolutely agree and considered using a different phrase but it’s been the phrase to use for fossil fuel powered cars for so long i decided they don’t get to exclusively steal it

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          EV’s only become popular when cheaper. It’s a fact.

          Not everyone lives in areas where solar installs at ean option. The offset doesn’t make sense when you go north or south of the globe where the sun don’t shine.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Not sure I agree with point #2 - I’d be willing to bet he would love to funnel some of that sweet tax money into his own pocket, but he doesn’t want it in the form of tax breaks for income earners, he wants it in the form of EV subsidies for Tesla, which Trump denied him by cutting the EV tax incentive from the spending bill. I don’t think he even acknowledges that tax breaks for billionaires are bad for the economy, just that the big bullshit bill is bad for him specifically.

        On everything else, though, I agree wholeheartedly. His brand is toxic now, and without being able to sell a sub-par product at dirt-cheap prices, he’s going to get a heavy dose of reality when consumers reject his rolling coffins in favor of cheaper alternatives.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          If course you don’t. That’s why you side with Trump. The fact that “trickle down economics” has been disproven time and time again means nothing to you folks.

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            Huh? Did you reply to the wrong person? Because I don’t side with Trump. Check my comment history.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    “America Party”

    Americans really are the ultimate parody of themselves. Have fun with your civil war.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    I hope this becomes big enough to split the right-wing vote. I wish him all the success possible.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Doesn’t seem terribly likely to me for Musk to concede before the election. There’s still something to gain from it being public knowledge how many voted for you last election. This did happen recently in BC, Canada though, where the established conservatives bowed out at the last minute to give votes to the new far-right party.

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

      • ExFed@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 days ago

        We’ll need ranked choice (or some other voting scheme other than First Past The Post). Otherwise it’ll just end up the same as it always has.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Need new rules in House and Senate, too. The majority party gets majority in all the committees, gets to pick all the committee chairs, etc. All of the current non-D/non-R members ‘caucus’ with one of the major parties, making them de facto members of that party. A third party with enough representation to block the other two from gaining majority would almost certainly end up in an alliance with one, leaving us back with functional two-party politics.

        • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          I’ll gladly accept a reactionary centrist spoiler party into the mix. Especially if it coincides with the Clinton wing of the DNC losing its ability to maintain its grip on power.

            • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              Obviously, they’re nothing centrist about this guy (besides, perhaps, his perceived position in the universe). They are, in fact, reactionaries, so definitionally right wing. But they believe they are splitting the difference between the Stalinist left (exemplified by the NYT) and the fascist right (unbeknownst to them, them).

            • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              The Dems who, since the shock of the Reagan revolution, swore off having a political project beyond “don’t make it worse” but accidentally foreclosed on making things better in the process. More recently, they’ve been heard saying things like “nothing will fundamentally change” in the face of a political situation that is very different from 40 years earlier.

              Basically all the powerful Dems since Bill Clinton. Groups like the Democratic Leadership Council. They’ll poo poo ideas that regularly poll at 80% support across all parties, then spend all their political capital barely carrying a compromise position with 48% support across the finish line.

              I really hope that we’re reaching a tipping point where people who believe in a better world and pursue policies to bring it about can have sustained political success

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Breaking the US from the failed 2-party system would require replacing first-past-the-post voting with at least ranked choice, if not a proportional system like Hare-Clarke, and probably scrapping the Electoral College altogether. Which may require constitutional amendments, or at least a partisan Supreme Court sympathetic to more democracy that would Chewbacca-defence it through regardless of legality.

    • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      Best case scenario is it will split the right wing vote. In Canada, we’re used to it going the other way with conservatives taking advantage of a split left.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Washington Post columnists said it would probably just capture the “Never Trumper” moderate Republican voters who currently begrudgingly vote Democratic because they understand that the Republican Party is nominating only yes-men and fascists.

        • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          The Dems leaned hard on the never Trumpers for votes last year and you can see where that got them. Elon can have them.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Especially not their opinion column but I’m just posting here because it’s interesting to see what the neoliberals think about it and it’s a good discussion point

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Same with the USA, the US Green Party is funded by Conservative PACs such as Badger Values. If there were left unity then the 8 million people who showed up for Biden 2020 would have shown up for Harris 2024, but a lot of people are convinced the DNC aren’t left enough and that primary elections are shams.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yeah…

      At best, it splits the MAGAt vote, making Dems a clear winner.

      At worst, it takes some GenZ dipshit votes away from Dems and causes chaos.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 days ago

    I’ll just point out the risk of what I’ll call “Joe Roganing” here. Elon pretends he hates both parties while there’s no election coming up. Then when the election arrives he “makes up his mind” and endorses Republicans. This allows him to 1) attract people fed up with both parties just to hand them to Republicans, and 2) have a credible that that forces Republicans to do his bidding.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 days ago

    The neo-Nazi saluting bastard wants a political party? F-him and strip him of US citizenship for illegally working in the USA.

    If anyone has a chance to create another party. AOC and Mamdani.

  • Waldschrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Now do another 10 or 20 parties more and maybe america could finally become a democratic country.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 days ago

    Has he filed any paperwork? Gathered any signatures?

    Didn’t think so. It’s just typical Elmo Skum: hurricane force hot air scented with billionaire quantities of bovine effluvia.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    I fail to see how splitting up the fascists is anything but a good thing. Let them fight.

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah, this seems like it may actually be some good news in this endless sea of shit we’ve been in. But the chances of it actually going anywhere are pretty slim.

    • hietsu@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      True that. Although in a would be tri-party system, so in case this new party gains somewhat reasonable backing, it gains significant bargaining power over the much bigger parties because it would likely hold keys to majority vote. So it might just become much greater than its apparent size… But yeah, I doubt much anything comes out of this.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Liberals hate musk and won’t vote for his party. Split the stupid vote and watch Dems win unwinnable races. If he pulls that off for 2 election cycles you might even see Republicans go in on ranked choice voting.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    How many weeks before he gets bored and abandons it when things don’t immediately work, just like everything else in his useless life?

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        He already bought himself an entire department with no oversight but got bored of it after a few months.

        • AZX3RIC@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          In 1962, Congress created the role of “special government employee,” which allows the executive branch, the legislative branch and independent federal agencies to bring on employees for specific roles on a temporary basis.

          SGEs are limited to working for the government for no more than 130 days out of a 365-day period, though they can work multiple years, and they can either be paid or unpaid. NPR has reported that Musk is not being paid for his work with DOGE.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            He didn’t make it to 130 days. He never mentioned that. Also, the law does not constrain this administration. He got bored when he didn’t immediately become loved and gave up like the little baby he is. Stop giving these bumbling oligarchs the benefit of the doubt and a veneer of legitimacy. You are an active part of the problem when you do.

          • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            If you’re just going to copy and paste from an NPR article, you might as well provide a link while you’re at it.